EN FR

Supreme Court to Only Hear from Big Governments and Big Unions in Landmark Case

Author: 2016/08/09
  • Taxpayers Federation intervenor status rejected - only citizens group that applied to intervene 
  • 12 unions granted intervenor status

OTTAWA, ON: The Supreme Court of Canada (SCC) has rejected the Canadian Taxpayers Federation (CTF) application to intervene in the final stage of the British Columbia Teachers Federation’s (BCTF) decade-long legal battle with the British Columbia government. This potentially landmark case could impact the ability of governments to control public sector costs.

The CTF sought intervenor status in order to offer a taxpayer perspective, who ultimately end up on the hook for the union contracts negotiated by governments across the country. It was the only citizens’ group to apply. In contrast, the SCC accepted 12 unions (in six groups) as intervenors. Seven governments will also act as intervenors (Federal, Alberta, Saskatchewan, Manitoba, Ontario, Quebec and Newfoundland and Labrador).

“This is a sad day for taxpayers – the highest court in the land would rather hear from big unions and big governments than the people who pay their salaries through their taxes,” said CTF Federal Director Aaron Wudrick. “With 12 government unions lining up with the BCTF, our different perspective on these issues was desperately needed.”

The BCTF had sent a letter to the SCC asking them to reject the CTF’s request to intervene. They did not oppose any other applicant.

The CTF argued in its application to intervene that “these appeals have clear implications for the ability of governments to make decisions on matters involving social and fiscal policy, to change course on those issues in light of changing socio-economic conditions and political feedback, and to be influenced by public mobilization through campaigning, advocacy, and ultimately, voting.”

“We would have loved to have made our concerns known to the court,” continued Wudrick. “The CTF wanted to stand up for the ability of duly-elected governments to carry out their democratic mandate, and for taxpayers, who are always stuck with the cost of union-friendly sweetheart deals.”

The case is expected to be heard by the Supreme Court of Canada this fall.


A Note for our Readers:

Is Canada Off Track?

Canada has problems. You see them at gas station. You see them at the grocery store. You see them on your taxes.

Is anyone listening to you to find out where you think Canada’s off track and what you think we could do to make things better?

You can tell us what you think by filling out the survey

Join now to get the Taxpayer newsletter

Franco Terrazzano
Federal Director at
Canadian Taxpayers
Federation

Join now to get the Taxpayer newsletter

Hey, it’s Franco.

Did you know that you can get the inside scoop right from my notebook each week? I’ll share hilarious and infuriating stories the media usually misses with you every week so you can hold politicians accountable.

You can sign up for the Taxpayer Update Newsletter now

Looks good!
Please enter a valid email address

We take data security and privacy seriously. Your information will be kept safe.

<