Taxes, Tall Tales and the Truth

Thank you for your kind introduction. It is pleasure to speak to you today.

As some of you may know, the Canadian Taxpayers Federation is a grassroots organization of concerned citizens who want make taxes low and reasonable and get government lean and accountable.

We have about 80,000 supporters across Canada, but the largest number is right here in Saskatchewan.

I would like to be able to take credit for those numbers, but I can't. The credit for the success of the Canadian Taxpayers Federation largely goes to four men whose actions encouraged the creation and growth of this organization to fight for the rights of ordinary taxpayers.

And who are these men, who have sold more CTF memberships than the rest of us combined? Their names are Chretien, Mulroney, Devine, and Romanow.

Because of them, the people of Saskatchewan bear one of the heaviest tax burdens in Canada.

Our high taxes kill jobs and businesses, erode family incomes, and make saving for the future impossible. They strip our poorest citizens of opportunity and send out best and brightest to live and work outside our province.

But we have an opportunity to change all of that.

There is growing evidence that tax cuts work. Lower taxes can stimulate growth, unearth the underground economy, create more jobs, and ultimately generate more revenues to dedicate toward debt reduction and social programs.

Our high tax burden is the most fundamental roadblocks to jobs, to prosperity, and to growth. It is up to all of us to put a stop to this taxpayer abuse once and for all.

The Tax Burden in Canada

There are a number of ways to measure and illustrate the extent of the tax burden in Canada.

(overhead #1)

Since 1961, the price of clothing has increased by 387%, the price of food by 414%, and the cost of shelter by 773%. But the average Canadian family's tax bill rose 1,286%!

In fact, the total tax bill now accounts for more of the average Canadian's personal budget than shelter, food, and clothing combined.

Part of the increase is due to the effects of inflation. But even calculating the change in terms of 1998 purchasing power, taxes went up by 139% over the period.

And having just finished filling out your income tax return, how do feel about the fact that we suffer under the highest personal income tax burden of any major industrialized country?

Our marginal tax rates (the rate of tax on the last dollar you earn) are also high. Most economists will tell you that marginal tax rates have the greatest impact on a person's decision about work.

(overhead #2)

Among G-7 countries, only Germany has higher marginal tax rates than Canada.

We also reach the highest marginal tax rate at a much lower income level than most other industrialized countries, at about $64,000 (Cdn.). In the U.S. a taxpayer only reaches the top marginal rate when their income reaches about $278,000 (U.S.).

On top of that, Canada also has one of the highest rates of capital gains tax. Most other countries don't have capital gains taxes, or have a much lower rate, and some provide full or partial indexation to offset the effects of inflation. Canadian are taxed on 75% of their capital gains regardless of inflation.

Contrary to what you hear from the government, the capital gains tax issue is not just of concern to high-income earners. In 1997, more than 800,000 Canadians registered some form of capital gains on their tax return, and nearly 60% of those taxpayers earned less than $50,000 a year.

It is a major source of income for retired Canadians - our seniors.

Business Taxes

As most of you will recognize, business taxes in Canada are relatively high. Our combined federal-provincial general corporate income tax rate averages about 43% - 4 points higher than U.S. rates, and 9 points higher than the G-7 average.

To make matters worse, Canada's business tax system is also complicated and dominated by "profit insensitive" taxes, such as capital taxes, property taxes, and payroll taxes – taxes that inhibit investment, discourage hiring, and raise compliance costs.

Businesses in Canada paid $19 billion in corporate income tax in 1995, AND over three times that amount in these profit insensitive taxes, for a total tax bill in the range of $84 billion.

The Tax Burden in Saskatchewan

We don't have to go all the way to Ottawa to see tax-happy politicians in action. We have a whole bunch right here is Saskatchewan.

(overhead #3)

Last year, the average family in this province paid about 50% of their income to various levels of government. To put it another way, every penny you earned up to July 2 went to government - one way or another. We call that day "Tax Freedom Day."

In contrast, our good neighbours in Manitoba get off the hook 10 days earlier, and in Alberta 19 days earlier. Saskatchewan taxpayers work almost three weeks longer than Albertans to satisfy the taxman.

Did you drive here today? We have the highest fuel taxes in the West.

Do you have an income? We have the second highest personal income taxes in Canada, after Quebec.

Do you own a house? We have the highest property taxes in the country.

(overhead #4)

Not only does Canada have the highest property tax burden in the industrialized world, but also within Canada, Saskatchewan has the heaviest property tax burden. I guess that makes us property tax champs of the world.

Relative to property value, on the residential side Saskatchewan is the worst at over $1,900 per $100,000 of property value. But our businesses are hit even harder. Saskatchewan is head and shoulders above the rest at over $4,600 per $100,000 of property value.

And now, here in Saskatoon, property taxes are going up by another 4.7%. (I'm sure you must all be very glad to hear about that.)

Property taxes are easily the most destructive, regressive, and complicated form of taxation.

The Hidden Tax – The Crown Utilities

Now here in Saskatchewan we don't just have regular taxes like the ones I've been talking about.

Our provincial politicians have been reluctant to raise income or sales taxes, which are highly visible. Instead, they use utility rates to tax us, charging rates well above the cost of producing and delivering the services and repaying debt.

As a result, the Crown utilities have made billions in excessive profits since 1991; profits far beyond what any private company operating in a normal environment with normal regulation would enjoy.

In fact, if the Royal Bank had made the same rate of return for its equity holders in 1998 that SaskEnergy has made for the Saskatchewan government, it would have made $15 billion in net income, instead of the $1.8 billion it did make.

Using the Crown utilities to raise funds for government is not only a very profitable form of taxation, it is also very regressive. High utility taxes fall most heavily on the poor and those people on fixed incomes. Unlike income taxes, there are no brackets and no "basic exemption" to keep the government from taking your last dollar. If you want to stay warm and keep the lights on, you have to pay.

The Myths about Tax Cuts

Just as a heavy tax burden is destructive, tax relief is constructive. It promotes productivity, economic expansion, and job growth. Leaving more money in the pockets of taxpayers boosts consumer spending, and increases the pool of investment capital that in turn creates more jobs.

Tax cuts increase the participation in the labour force and lower the overall wage cost for employers. Tax cuts also encourage new businesses and entrepreneurs and help unearth the underground economy. And lower taxes can actually increase government revenue over the long haul because economic growth is spurred.

There is historical and empirical proof to support each of these effects.

So why don't more governments cut taxes? Well, because of what I call "taxes, tall tales, and the truth."

There is the spin we hear in the budget speech, and then there's reality.

For example, politicians have told us:

  • That the government has balanced the books mainly through spending cuts, not tax hikes;
  • That taxes have actually gone down over the past few years, and
  • That we can't afford to cut taxes quickly because of the debt and other spending obligations.

    Lets look at each story in turn.



    Story A: The books have been balanced through cuts, not taxes.

    The federal government's tax revenues have increased by 32% over the past 5 years. A closer look reveals the budget was balanced 69% through revenue increases (partially generated by higher taxes), 23% from off-loading to the provinces and reductions to the defence budget, and only 8% through cutting the cost of other federal programs.

    (overhead #5)

    In Saskatchewan, the government has balanced its books 87% through revenue increases and only 13% through cuts to government programs.

    From 1991 to 1998, provincial tax revenues grew 3 ½ times faster than inflation, 1 ½ times faster than economic growth, and more than 25 times the rate of Saskatchewan's population growth. (You will note that this clearly indicates an increased tax burden.)

    So "Story A" is untrue. The books have largely been balanced on the backs of taxpayers.



    Story B. Taxes have actually gone down.

    At first glance, the last few rounds of federal and provincial budgets appear to have provided taxpayers with some modest tax relief.

    The 1998 and 1999 federal budgets eliminated the 3% surtax and increased the basic personal exemption to just over $7,100 a year.

    Likewise, the 1998 Saskatchewan budget offered a two-point reduction in the provincial basic income tax rate, and the 1999 provincial budget dropped one point off the PST.

    It's not that we're ungrateful for small favours, but the federal and provincial politicians who tell you they are putting more dollars back in your pocket are not telling the whole truth.

    The overall tax burden is not falling for taxpayers in Saskatchewan for three reasons: increasing payroll taxes, higher property taxes, and bracket creep.

    First, the recent cut in Employment Insurance premiums will be more than offset by the increase in CPP premiums. Someone earning $39,000 a year will actually pay about $377 more in payroll taxes in 1999 compared to 1992 and $60 more than last year. Employers are also dinged for more taxes. In 1999, employers will pay an extra $28 in payroll taxes for employees at the $39,000 threshold and a full $332 more in 1999 compared to 1992.

    Secondly, property taxes continue to rise. Revenues from municipal and school property taxes have climbed by 60% since 1985. Many municipalities and school boards are raising taxes to meet provincially mandated cost increases, such as the salary increases for teachers.

    So although we may have seen some marginal reduction in provincial tax rates in the last few budgets, some of this burden has simply been shifted onto property taxpayers. A clear case of "give with one hand, and take with the other".

    And last, but certainly not least, "bracket creep" has negated much of the so-called tax relief in the federal and provincial budgets.

    I cannot overemphasize the damage done by bracket creep.

    Tax brackets and tax credits have not been adjusted for inflation since 1992. The trap is sprung when a basic "cost of living" increase in your income pushes you into a higher tax bracket without making you richer. In fact, with bracket creep a cost of living increase can actually make you poorer.

    Bracket creep has been a great way for our governments to hike taxes without ever having to go before our elected legislatures to get approval. All they have to do is sit on their duffs and watch the bucks roll in.

    The effect on taxpayers has been significant. Someone with a $40,000 income will have paid $9,400 in extra taxes to the federal and provincial government over the past decade -- and over $1,300 in 1998 alone -- because of bracket creep.

    The federal government took in over $10 billion in new tax revenue because of bracket creep in 1998.

    The provinces too have shared in this windfall of cash; approximately one-third of the extra bracket creep taxes has gone into provincial treasuries.

    (overhead #6)

    Bracket creep in Saskatchewan has given the politicians hundreds of millions in new revenue to spend since 1992.

    It has all but wiped out the tax relief in the last few provincial budgets. In 1998, the 2-point reduction in provincial income tax in 1998 delivered about $45 million in tax relief over the full year. However, bracket creep delivered $95 million in new tax revenue for the government. Therefore, net provincial income taxes actually went up by about $50 million last year.

    So "Story B" is also wrong. Taxes have been going up, not down.

    Story C: We can't afford to cut taxes quickly.

    I believe this was the myth that Finance Minister Eric Cline was peddling when he spoke to the Saskatoon Chamber recently.

    Our response is simply: why not! We believe that Saskatchewan can't afford NOT to cut taxes quickly.



    The Challenges Ahead

    What is the bottom line for Saskatchewan?

    If we are going to save our healthcare and education systems for the people of our province, we need more people and more money to come here, and we need more people and more money to stay here.

    In other words, we need a larger, stronger tax base thoroughly grounded on strong economic growth and diversification.

    Historically, Saskatchewan was a place for trailblazers, but in recent years our political leaders have settled into a comfortable rut. We need to recapture the spirit of innovation and progress that has been the source of some of Saskatchewan's greatest success.

    And we can do that with lower taxes and an improved tax system. We need simplicity, fairness, and accountability in our tax system.

    Saskatchewan at a Crossroads

    Our province has great potential. All that is required is for us and our government to choose the best road to the future.

    On one road is more of the same. Our future as a have-not province, with a shaky economy dominated a tax burden that hurts families and discourages business. This is the road that leads our children out of the province to build their futures elsewhere.

    And then there is the road that the Taxpayers recommend. It is a road to achieving Saskatchewan's full potential, as a province with a strong job-producing economy fueled by enterprise and initiative. A province where government is accountable, taxes are reasonable, and taxpayers get good value for their tax dollar.

    This is the kind of province where our children can build lives and careers.

    The Taxpayers Federation is eager to get on this road.

    Thank you.
  • By: Richard Truscott
    Posted: April 27, 1999
    Topic: Saskatchewan

    Type: Related

    Bookmark and Share Join Us   |   Donate

    Canada's Federal Debt

    Your Share

    The federal government is adding $58 million a day to our debt. By 2015-16, the debt is slated to hit $614 billion. Support our campaign for balanced federal budgets and help us STOP this clock.

    View Debt »

    Spokespeople & Blog

    In five provinces and Ottawa a team of dedicated professionals is standing up to special interests, ensuring that taxpayers' voices are being heard.

    View all spokespeople »
    Go to Blog »

    In The News

     

     

    Sign-Up

    Join with over 70,000 Canadian taxpayers. Get instant action updates and make a difference.

    64,232

    Donate
    Take Action

    Vimeo video Facebook Twitter RSS Feed YouTube Channel