SK: Prairie Valley School Division's Puzzling Motions
Why did the board accept its Director of Education’s resignation in one motion, then hire him back in the following motion for the same pay and position?
The Canadian Taxpayers Federation (CTF) called on the Chair of the Prairie Valley School Division today to explain why the board accepted their Director of Education’s resignation in one motion and then rehired the individual back for the same pay and duties in the following motion.
Minutes from the board’s May 11, 2011 meeting show the cryptic back to back motions. The CTF confirmed with the board’s Director of Education, that he was the individual in question and that his pay and position did not change.
The Director of Education would not indicate if he planned to draw on his pension from the Saskatchewan Teachers Superannuition Plan. The plan currently has a $4 billion unfunded liability which is fully backstopped by taxpayers.
“Why would the board do this?” asked CTF Prairie Director Colin Craig. “If the move was done to allow the individual to start drawing on his pension, the board should be up front about that.”
“We hope the board will disclose their legal opinions on the matter as well as their letter of request to the province which sought an exemption from the requirement to advertise the position,” added Craig.
To view the open letter to the school board chair, click here.
Canada's Federal Debt
Your Share
The federal government is adding $58 million a day to our debt. By 2015-16, the debt is slated to hit $614 billion. Support our campaign for balanced federal budgets and help us STOP this clock.
Spokespeople & Blog
In five provinces and Ottawa a team of dedicated professionals is standing up to special interests, ensuring that taxpayers' voices are being heard.
In The News
-
How much do Canadians pay in taxes?
read more » -
BC gas taxes highest in Canada
read more » -
BC government's PR firms
read more » -
HST and Carbon tax reason for BC government's unpopularity
read more » -
TransLink executives receive big bonuses
read more » -
Reforming gold-plated MP Pensions
read more » -
Questions raised on flood relief funding to Peguis First Nations
read more » -
More taxes in 2012 Manitoba Budget
read more » -
Photo Radar Busted in Winnipeg!
read more » -
Big pay for transit police
read more » -
Free the Fishermen from Freshwater Fish Marketing Corporation
read more » -
TransLink executives receive big bonuses
read more » -
Two bills introduced in Ontario legislature to protect taxpayers
read more » -
Host of new tax increases for BC
read more » -
Questionable expenses at Freshwater Fish Marketing Corp
read more » -
TransLink has lost $230 million due to unpaid fares!
read more » -
TransLink's fare evasion problems
read more » -
TransLink can't collect its fines
read more » -
Sask Film Tax Credit Briefing
read more » -
Should there be cuts in the size of Canada’s federal public Service?
read more » -
CCPA calls for massive spending increases in federal budget
read more » -
Are attack ads on Bob Rae legit?
read more » -
Is TransLink Police force a waste of money?
read more » -
Chalk Talk: Growing Government Pay and Pension Gap
read more »



























Comments
From the inside
Yes senior admins receive bonuses.
Difference between two teacher plans
TSC is the old fund and teachers that started employment after 1981 are NOT on this plan and their is no liability for the new fund to the gov't or taxpayers. Yes, the gov't is on the hook for the old plan, but these folks are 95% retired already and that was the deal the gov't offered at the time to many groups, not just teachers. Interesting that Colin Craig and Gormley have painted all teachers with the same brush. Teachers on STRP or the new plan are completely responsible for funding their own pension.
Not really so puzzling
It really isn't that puzzling is it, considering that there was no change in salary or position (according to the story). So what purpose would this transaction serve? My guess would be..... a technical purpose. Maybe he was hired back on a different kind of contract. Maybe the contract he was on did not comply with the technical requirements to collect pension at the same time. Is there a was for anyone to find out?
Hey, while we're asking questions here does anyone know if senior administration receives incentive bonuses in addition to their salaries?
Puzzling motion
It really isn't that puzzling is it? If there was no change in salary or title? It is also interesting that this came about during teacher negotiations. One question I have - Is the Senior Administration also receiving incentive bonuses and to what dollar amount if they are?
Pension and salary
Double-dipping goes on all the time in Ottawa. I love the military, and fully support all who are at the sharp end (I'm wearing red today), but DNDHQ is crawling with "retired" former soldiers drawing pensions and on contract in their former jobs. I personally know two (husband/colonel and wife/corporal). Four salaries. No mortgage. Must be sweet.
Post new comment