Kudos and Caution on Sask Budget

Positive reinforcement is a wonderful thing, so let’s start off by giving a thumbs-up to Finance Minister Ken Krawetz for a few goodies in his budget plan.

First, he did something that sounds really geeky, but it will save virtually everyone in the province a good chunk of change.

He increased something known as the “basic personal exemption” by $1,000. In plain English, you were supposed to be able to earn $13,535 this year before starting to pay the lowest provincial income tax rate (11 per cent). But thanks to Minister Krawetz’s budget, you’ll be able to earn $14,535 before paying provincial income taxes.

The extra $1,000 of tax free income will save you $110. As the spousal exemption is also going up, if you earn $29,070 or more and have a spouse who is a dependent, you’ll be able to save $220.

But wait, it gets better. Have a kid or two to claim as dependents? The child benefit went up by $500, so you’ll be able to save another $55 for every child under your care.

In our pre-budget meeting with the Minister, the Canadian Taxpayers Federation recommended increasing the basic personal exemption to $15,000 by 2013. Thus, you can see why we’re so pleased to see such a large jump in just one year.

Moving along to the small business income tax rate, the government has committed to chop the rate from 4.5 per cent down to 2 per cent as of July 1, 2011. That’s expected to save small businesses an estimated $80 million annually.

It will also help grow the economy. Ask just about any small business owner and they will tell you how they usually put any tax savings towards buying new equipment, hiring employees and other ways to grow their company.

Another goodie that just about everyone can applaud is the government’s continued push towards reducing school taxes. This year they’ll be down about $55.6 million in total; $31.3 million lower for farmers, $5.6 million lower for commercial properties and $18.7 million lower for residential properties.

If that wasn’t good enough, the province has not only tabled a balanced budget, they will pay down the debt by $325 million.

All in all, you can see why it’s a good news budget.

However, that doesn’t mean it isn’t without faults.

First of all, there’s no long term plan for debt retirement. Paying off Saskatchewan’s $4.1 billion debt in $325 million chunks means it’s going to take a dozen years to do so. While Saskatchewan may be the only province to run a balanced budget and repay debt this year, when times are good debt repayment needs to be a higher priority.

Second, spending is expected to increase by 5.5 per cent this year. Since 2006-07, the Wall government has increased spending by 39 per cent in just five budgets.

That’s simply not a sustainable approach to spending. There’s no question Saskatchewan is growing and needs infrastructure upgrades, but so did Alberta. The only problem was the Alberta government couldn’t turn off the spending taps when revenues dried up. As a result they’re now battling huge deficits. Saskatchewan should exercise more prudent spending to avoid making the same mistake.

All things considered, it’s a good budget. More focus on spending restraint and debt repayment would make it an even better one.

 

 

 

By: Colin Craig
Posted: March 24, 2011
Topic: Saskatchewan

Type: Commentary

Bookmark and Share Join Us   |   Donate

Comments

Good budget? For who?

What about the families living on less than $31,000? Raising the basic personal amount doesn't help them, does it? Neither do property tax cuts, as they aren't likely to be property owners. The landlord isn't likely to drop the rent because their property taxes were cut. Also, I can't help but notice more than 50% of the property tax cuts were given to the business sector, not families. What type of an impact will lowering school taxes have on the delivery of education?

I think it's media spin to close the article with "All things considered, it's a good (news) budget."
I'd re-summarize the comment from from "all in all, good news budget" to "upper class, great budget, middle class, mediocre budget, lower class, no change, no benefit, no impact".
And "more focus on spending restraint and debt repayment"???
How about more focus on the people that truly need assistance, like students, young families and seniors?
And while you may think my comments are a bash against the Sask Party and in support of some other party... you'd be quick to assume that... as my non-partisan support goes for equality with my fellow man, those that need support the most, and is beyond religion, beyond politics, beyond poverty, and beyond war... and somewhere in line with common sense... something that apparently is something money can't buy, because this "money budget" does nothing to illustrate that or solve those problems when it gets brought to light.

What about the families living on less than $31,000? Raising the basic personal amount doesn't help them, does it? Neither do property tax cuts, as they aren't likely to be property owners. The landlord isn't likely to drop the rent because their property taxes were cut. Also, I can't help but notice more than 50% of the property tax cuts were given to the business sector, not families. What type of an impact will lowering school taxes have on the delivery of education?

I think it's media spin to close the article with "All things considered, it's a good (news) budget."

I'd re-summarize the comment from "all in all, good news budget" to "upper class, great budget, middle class, mediocre budget, lower class, no change, no benefit, no impact".

And "more focus on spending restraint and debt repayment"???

How about more focus on the people that truly need assistance, like students, young families and seniors?

And while you may think my comments are a bash against the Sask Party and in support of some other party... you'd be quick to assume that... as my non-partisan support goes for equality with my fellow man, those that need support the most, and is beyond religion, beyond politics, beyond poverty, and beyond war... and somewhere in line with common sense... something that apparently is something money can't buy, because this "money budget" does nothing to illustrate that or solve those social problems of poverty, homelessness and scarcity when it gets brought to light.

"You never change things by fighting the existing reality. To change something, build a new model that makes the old one obsolete." - Buckminster Fuller

The monetary market system of economics is not good or evil, right or wrong... just obsolete. Like a horse and carriage to the automobile, a transatlantic passenger ship to an airliner, or Windows 3.1 to Windows 7. Are any of those perfect? Nope, but they are evolution that happens whether you agreed to it or not, and they are a more realistic starting point for advancement than trying to fix an outdated, obsolete, broken down way of thinking.

 

 

 

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Post new comment

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Canada's Federal Debt

Your Share

The federal government is adding $58 million a day to our debt. By 2015-16, the debt is slated to hit $614 billion. Support our campaign for balanced federal budgets and help us STOP this clock.

View Debt »

Spokespeople & Blog

In five provinces and Ottawa a team of dedicated professionals is standing up to special interests, ensuring that taxpayers' voices are being heard.

View all spokespeople »
Go to Blog »

In The News

 

 

Sign-Up

Join with over 70,000 Canadian taxpayers. Get instant action updates and make a difference.

64,232

Donate
Take Action

Vimeo video Facebook Twitter RSS Feed YouTube Channel