BC: Eliminate the Property Transfer Tax

Taxpayers in British Columbia are outraged about the harmonized sales tax (HST), and rightly so. It will add a new tax to many items previously exempt from the provincial sales tax (PST), such as restaurant meals and new homes. The HST does, however, have some theoretical benefits. It simplifies the tax system and makes the province a more competitive place for business investment. 

Nevertheless, the surprise HST announcement was met by a business lobbying effort demanding relief from the tax. One group that got a break was the new home building industry. While this may help a few new home buyers, it undermines the tax simplification benefits of the HST and does little to improve B.C.'s competitiveness. In fact, the government could have bolstered the competitiveness of the province and helped all families struggling to purchase homes by eliminating the property transfer tax instead.

The property transfer tax (PTT) hits all property sales. It has no economic benefit, taxes mobility and is a job killer that discourages companies from locating in B.C. The PTT adds 2 per cent to the property price, less $2,000. So, a family struggling to buy a $525,000 home would have to pay an additional $8,500 in PTT. 

The PTT was brought in by the Vander Zalm government in 1988 and became such a fantastic cash cow that no government since has eliminated it. Yet, the B.C. government knows the PTT is a bad tax. A motion at the BC Liberal Convention in 2006 moved that the government abolish the PTT. The resolution was passed with overwhelming support and is part of BC Liberal party policy.

But this is where party policy and government policy diverge. 

This tax generated almost $1 billion in revenue each year over the past five years on the backs of families struggling to buy homes, searching for a better life in new locations, and on businesses trying to expand. It makes B.C. a less competitive place for business investment.

Not only that, the revenue brought in by the PTT makes the break on the HST for new home buyers look like chump change. 

Since it announced the HST, the government said it wants to be sure some new home buyers pay 'no more' in tax on new homes than they would have paid before the HST. Then, to show it had been listening to complaints about the HST, the government raised the threshold for the HST rebate on new homes from $400,000 to $525,000, and the maximum rebate from $20,000 to $26,250. This move will only put about $80 million per year back into the pockets of homebuyers, far less than what eliminating the PTT would have. 

So the question becomes, why would the government complicate the HST and pander to the building industry by giving them a break instead of just getting rid of the PTT? The government might say it was because it listens to its key support groups. However, the real reason is more likely because government is addicted to the revenue stream the PTT provides.

If the government were truly interested in making B.C. a competitive place for business investment and helping families buy homes, it would eliminate the PTT.

By: Maureen Bader
Posted: January 27, 2010
Topic: British Columbia

Type: Commentary

Bookmark and Share Join Us   |   Donate

Search our Archive

Comments

Transfer tax

We had been seriously considering purchasing property in BC as a retirement property.  The HST and Transfer taxes have cancelled that idea. There are a lot better places to retire and invest than BC, particularly since BC is commonly seen as an overtaxed, union run province where 105% of the province is under Indian "traditional" land claims.

 

BC is a bad place to be.

HST/PPT

A consumption tax (HST) is as fair as a tax can be...the more you spend the more you pay. The PPT also closes a major loophole on taxation. I owned a hardware store for 23 years in the town I live in..Crofton. Over 1/2 of the people I dealt with that changed homes in less than 5 years did so to avoid capital gains tax. Buy or build a home, live in it. fix it up and resell at a profit. The PPT redirects some of the profit to the province. I owned my previous home for 32 years, the $4000 PPT I paid when I moved annoyed me but it is likely the last time I will pay it. The tax that many of my friends worry about most is property tax. In North Cowichan my taxes have doubled in 8 years, now over $4000/yr (not $4000 PPT once). My entire CPP is consumed by property tax and the new BC Hydro rates. We do not have enough money to spend to worry about the HST or the PPT. The PPT should be diverted to a fund to give homeowners tax relief, such as school taxes that have no relation to a homeowners ability to pay. Jim Copley

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Post new comment

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image. Ignore spaces and be careful about upper and lower case.

Canada's Federal Debt

Your Share

The federal government is adding $153 million a day to our debt. At this rate, the $105-billion in debt repayment between 1997 – 2008 will be wiped out next year. Support our campaign for a federal balanced budget law and help us STOP this clock.

View Debt »

Spokespeople & Blog

In five provinces and Ottawa a team of dedicated professionals is standing up to special interests, ensuring that taxpayers' voices are being heard.

View all spokespeople »
Go to Blog »

In The News

 

Sign-Up

Join with over 60,000 Canadian taxpayers. Get instant action updates and make a difference.

64,232

Donate
Take Action

FacebookTwitterRSS FeedYouTube Channel