End the Long-Gun Registry

The long-gun registry, touted in 1995 to cost $85 million to operate, is now up to an estimated $2 billion and counting. The registry was an ill-conceived crime-fighting measure that did little more than add paperwork and expenses for hunters, farmers and recreational gun users. For taxpayers, it added higher taxes! Fortunately, taxpayers have the best chance in 15 years to bring the wasteful long-gun registry to an end.

Bill C-391, a private member's bill to eliminate the long-gun registry brought forward by Manitoba MP Candice Hoeppner, passed second reading in federal Parliament on November 4, 2009, 164 to 137 thanks to the votes of 12 New Democrats, 8 Liberals, and 1 Independent MP who voted with 143 Conservatives.  CTF supporters played a significant role in contacting lawmakers before this important vote.

The bill then went before 12 MPs on the Standing Committee on Public Safety and National Security. CTF supporters again got organized and were successful in requesting Kevin Gaudet be invited to testify.  Kevin spoke to the Committee on May 25th. Unfortunately, the majority of Committee members that support the wasteful long gun registry were not persuaded and passed a motion to kill the bill that is scheduled to be voted on in the House of Commons on September 22nd.  If the motion passes, all our work of the past 15 years will be returned to square one.

 

Related Media

READ MORE

This motion can only be defeated with the votes of opposition lawmakers. Michael Ignatieff has told the 8 Liberal MPs who previously voted to scrap the long-gun registry to change their votes or face discipline. Jack Layton meanwhile is allowing his MPs to vote their conscious.  Please contact these MPs and commend them for their courage. Tell them to stay the course or remain absent from the vote if their party bosses are threatening them.

Second, please send an urgent donation so we can put radio ads on the air supporting the position taken by these opposition MPs and encourage them not to back down.

Seventy-two per cent of Canadians recently told pollster Angus Reid that the long gun registry has done nothing to prevent crime. An unscientific survey of rank and file police officers was even more decisive, with 92% of them wanting it scrapped.

Should the motion on September 22 fail, Bill C-391 will then move to third and final reading in the House of Commons and be one step closer to law!

Donate

Contact lawmakers

Sign petition

Related Articles:

Comments

This has been academically demonstrated

This defense argument is an excellent point.

Some observers believe the Virigina Tech Massacre is one example of why gun control is the wrong way to go when preventing crime. The ironic conclusion was first powerfully promoted in John Lott's study entitled "More Guns, Less Crime."

Lott wondered whether allowing people to cary concealed handguns deterred violent crime. He believed that if criminals weren't entirely sure who had guns to fight back and who didn't, they would be far less cavalier in their aggresive criminal attempts.

Believe it or not, his study of all 3054 U.S. counties from 1977 to 1996 bore his theory out. Although gun ownership rose from 27.4% in 1988 to 37% by 1996, crime rates fell. And the states with the greatest decrease in crime rates were the ones with the fastest increases in gun ownership.

The Western Standard's article, "Bulletproofing Canada" (May 21, 2007), reports,

According to Lott, for each additional year that laws allowing people to carry concealed handguns were on the books, robberies declined by two per cent, rapes by two per cent and murders by three per cent. If all states that did not permit carrying concealed handguns had allowed them in 1992, for instance, there would have been 1,839 fewer murders, 3727 rapes and 10,990 aggravated assaults.

School shootings also back up this theory. Lott looked at the eight public-school shootings between 1997 and 2000. In two of these cases--Pearl, Miss., and Edinboro, Pa.--the attacks were stopped by citizens with guns. Lott also examined all multiple-victim public shootings in the U.S. between 1977 and 1995. During this time 14 states adopted right-to-carry gun laws, and the number of such shootings declined by 84%, with deaths in the shootings reduced by 90%.

The Western Standard concludes,

It is sadly ironic that the Virginia Tech story might have been different if a bill to prohibit so-called "gun-free zones," such as the one at Virginia Tech, had passed the Virginia General Assembly last year. That legislation was drafted to prevent state universities like Virginia Tech from prohibiting students with concealed handgun permits from carrying guns on campus.

Murderers bent on a rampage care nothing about the law. But many citizens who could prevent them do. The best gun control is often control by guns, not control of them. It's why after doing his study, Lott bought a gun.

Canada's Federal Debt

Your Share

The federal government is adding $135 million a day to our debt. At this rate, the $105-billion in debt repayment between 1997 – 2008 will be wiped out next year. Support our campaign for a federal balanced budget law and help us STOP this clock.

View Debt »

Spokespeople & Blog

In five provinces and Ottawa a team of dedicated professionals is standing up to special interests, ensuring that taxpayers' voices are being heard.

View all spokespeople »
Go to Blog »

In The News

 

 

Sign-Up

Join with over 70,000 Canadian taxpayers. Get instant action updates and make a difference.

64,232

Donate
Take Action

FacebookTwitterRSS FeedYouTube Channel