MPs Cash in on $116 million in Pension & Severance Bonanza
OTTAWA, ON: The Canadian Taxpayers Federation (CTF) today released its calculations of estimated pension and severance payments paid to the 113 MPs who were either defeated or did not seek re-election in the May 2, 2011 general election. Defeated and retiring MPs will collect $4.9 million in pension payments in their first year, reaching a cumulative total of $111.5 million by age 80. In addition, another $4.3 million in severance cheques will be issued to former MPs. The pension and severance calculations for individual MPs are available HERE.
“While many MPs went down to defeat last night, most are still big winners,” said CTF National Research Director Derek Fildebrandt. “Even though losing an election can be hard, MPs should find a nice soft landing with their ‘golden parachute.’”
Seventeen former MPs will gather more than $100,000-plus a year in pension income including: Peter Milliken ($147K), Gilles Duceppe ($141K), Joe Volpe ($120K), and Jean-Pierre Blackburn ($106K).
As for the lifetime sweepstakes (estimated benefits to age 80) 5 MPs enter the $3-million dollar-plus club including: Keith Martin ($3.9 million), Albina Guarnieri ($3.8 million), Jay Hill ($3.3 million), Chuck Strahl ($3.3 million) and Michel Guimond ($3 million). An additional 19 MPs will receive more than $2 million before reaching age 80.
The CTF supports a reasonable pension plan and severance package for MPs commensurate with norms in the private sector. Since it’s founding in 1990, the CTF has consistently advocated for the introduction of a matching dollar-for-dollar defined-contribution pension plan – as the CTF successfully campaigned for in Saskatchewan and Ontario. The current federal defined-benefit pension plan requires taxpayers to cough up $4 for every $1 contributed by an MP.
Fildebrandt stated, “The vast majority of Canadians working in the private sector have no private pension plan of their own and those few who do, normally have defined-contribution, RRSP-style plans. Most Canadians have to save for their retirements the old-fashion way. MPs by contrast are guaranteed a steady payout regardless of how investments and the market perform.”
Defeated or retiring MPs are eligible to collect a fully-indexed pension at age 55 if they have served at least 6 years in the House of Commons. MPs who have not served the minimum years and receive no pension collect a severance equal to 50 per cent of their total salary. Former MPs who are eligible for a pension but have not reached the age of 55 are entitled to both a severance and pension. If a member turns 55 years old within six months of being eligible for a pension, a reduced severance cheque is paid to them. Lump sum severance payments range from a low of $78,866 to a high of $116,624 – a figure paid out to defeated Liberal leader Michael Ignatieff and several ministers.
Defeated Labrador MP Todd Russell was less than once month short of qualifying for his pension, being elected in a May 24, 2005 by-election. Fildebrandt noted, “By keeping Mr. Todd out of Parliament, the voters of Labrador saved Canadian taxpayers almost $600,000 in pension payouts.”
Concluding, Fildebrandt stated, “With this shakeup in Parliament, it is time to get on with bringing MP pensions and severance in line with taxpayer expectation. With new Conservative MPs claiming to respect taxpayers and new New Democrat MPs claiming to represent low-income Canadians, they can both lead by example and get on with reforming fat-cat MP pensions.”
Contact:
Derek Fildebrandt, Acting Federal Director & National Research Director
1-800-265-0442 (office) or 613-794-6554 (mobile)
dfildebrandt@taxpayer.com
Canada's Federal Debt
Your Share
The federal government is adding $58 million a day to our debt. By 2015-16, the debt is slated to hit $614 billion. Support our campaign for balanced federal budgets and help us STOP this clock.
Spokespeople & Blog
In five provinces and Ottawa a team of dedicated professionals is standing up to special interests, ensuring that taxpayers' voices are being heard.
In The News
-
How much do Canadians pay in taxes?
read more » -
BC gas taxes highest in Canada
read more » -
BC government's PR firms
read more » -
HST and Carbon tax reason for BC government's unpopularity
read more » -
TransLink executives receive big bonuses
read more » -
Reforming gold-plated MP Pensions
read more » -
Questions raised on flood relief funding to Peguis First Nations
read more » -
More taxes in 2012 Manitoba Budget
read more » -
Photo Radar Busted in Winnipeg!
read more » -
Big pay for transit police
read more » -
Free the Fishermen from Freshwater Fish Marketing Corporation
read more » -
TransLink executives receive big bonuses
read more » -
Two bills introduced in Ontario legislature to protect taxpayers
read more » -
Host of new tax increases for BC
read more » -
Questionable expenses at Freshwater Fish Marketing Corp
read more » -
TransLink has lost $230 million due to unpaid fares!
read more » -
TransLink's fare evasion problems
read more » -
TransLink can't collect its fines
read more » -
Sask Film Tax Credit Briefing
read more » -
Should there be cuts in the size of Canada’s federal public Service?
read more » -
CCPA calls for massive spending increases in federal budget
read more » -
Are attack ads on Bob Rae legit?
read more » -
Is TransLink Police force a waste of money?
read more » -
Chalk Talk: Growing Government Pay and Pension Gap
read more »



























Comments
MP pension vs diability pensions
I think that the MP's are getting to much of a pension hike while people that are on disability pension do not get enough money each month to be able to eat properly. Most of these people did not ask for their disability. Most had good jobs and were struck down with some king of disability such as MS, MD, etc... I think these MP's should be ashame of themself for agreeing to such a pension hike...
And another thing during the election none and I say none of the parties ever mentioned anything about the disable people as to how they could help these people. I think they should really think about the disable because one day without wanting to they may end up as a disable persons.
To all the government ministers and their assosiates please do think about what could happend to you one day without any notice.
RM Robert
MP pensions
Now that Stephen Harper has a majority, he is going to correct this issue! In the "reform party" days, he did not even wanted a pension... Ottawa political culture changes everybody!
MP PENSION
SUCH A RIPP OFF.WHY ARE THEY PAID SO HIGH? ARE THEY PUBLIC SERVANTS OR ARE THEY MAKING PUBLIC THEIR SERVANTS.
The Real World
I am 57 years old. If I choose to retire tomorrow, I will get nothing. Once I reach age 60 and have had zero income for two months, I can apply for CPP. If I wait until I am 65, I will get a bit more but it is still a maximum of $934.17 a month and I will also get the Old Age Pension. I have paid into CPP for the last 40 years and I have worked pretty much non-stop for that entire time. I spent all my income keeping my family afloat and any savings I tried to accumulate were sucked up by life's practical jokes and learning experiences. There was never any room for an RRSP and the company I work for now is good but small and has no pension plan. The most lavish vacation I ever had was two weeks in a tent with my kids. Needless to say, I will keep working until I drop dead because I really have no other option and, believe it or not, I am OK with that. That is the consequence of my life decisions and nothing more. I have had a good life and raised a family to be proud of. I will just keep on budgeting to include participation in the standard Canadian retirement plan - winning the lottery.
MP pensions
I disagree with your stance.
In this case, federal government Members of Parliament cannot be compared with the Private Sector. You appear to be disagreeing with the idea of pensions, more than with the amounts. The idea of pensions includes that a person working for the government must keep careful separation between any possible conflicts of interest between her/his decisions as an MP and what is happening in the private sector. Thus, an MP cannot be concerned about building their own retirement piggy-bank while serving the country. The country thus needs to be responsible to be certain that the retired MP's have an income in their very old age that will prevent them from being in penury at that time when they may not longer be able to earn an income themselves. It is irresponsible for a nation to not want to support their former members of the government who have given up their own lives to work for all of us for a period of time.
About the amounts, you have not indicated what life-time amount of retirement income is a good idea for someone whose work has been the governing of a nation. How much do we appreciate the work these people have done for us, including the sacrifices within their own lives? When the CTF gives a lifetime amount of a pension, you do not say what you consider a commensurate amount for other government workers or for workers in the private sector, regardless of source of the income, yet, that is essential to accurately interpreting your concern about amounts.
There are other factors to consider, such as existing personal wealth, and whether MP's can voluntarily not receive their pension. It seems counter-intuitive for a very wealthy person to receive a substantial government pension when serious national problems cannot be addressed financially. Beyond that, it does become 'murky', and simply inhuman and disrespectful toward people who have given much of their lives to public service, to not support them in old age.
with respect, Janet
Government Defined Pensions
Canadians taxpayers should not be making any contributions to government defined pensions period. These plans are outdated and are creating huge unfunded cost to the next generation. For example, how can the ONTARIO TEACHERS PENSION PLAN have a unfunded liability for 2010 of approx 2 billion dollars. This fund has 115 billion dollars for 550 thousand employees. The total dollars for all canadian WORKERS (18 MILLION) IS APPROX 145 BILLION. There are 3.5 million GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES across this country . The CANADIAN TAXPAYERS ANNUAL CONTRIBUTIONS to these plans are around 20 billion dollars. This money could be invested in health care for all. THERE are many ways for government employees to fund their own retirement ,RRSP,TFSA,SAVINGS ,SALE OF ASSETS. ALSO A CONSIDERATION OF EARLY RETIRERMENT should be addresed .The average retirement age ranges from (55yrs TEACHERS) TO (58YRS GOVERNMENT) EMPLOYEES. Numbers indicate these people are retired longer than they worked. This accounts for the 250 billion dollar (UNFUNDED PENSION AND BENIFIT LIABILITY ) that the CANADIAN TAXPAYER is on the hook for. There is a FUNDAMENTAL and STRUCTURAL problem that has to be addressed, however; the people who decide these concerns are the same people who recieve this benifits. I CALL THAT A CONFLICT of interest.
MP Pensions
Come on and get real - I am not paying taxes to fund their life long slaries - who pays mine - oh and by the way I only need 1 year of Gilles Duceppe's pension to live happily for the rest of my life. Talk about a great job with massive perks. We need to stop this now - no more tax dollars from me - I'll quit my job first!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
MP Pensions
If their formula was transfered to the private sector would it be illegal ?
MP Pensions
Most definitely, it would be illegal.
Post new comment