Lowdown on New Year Tax Changes for 2010
On the East Coast: NB soars into tax competitiveness while NS plans tax hikes
On the West Coast: BC’s sees modest gains and HST looms
OTTAWA: The Canadian Taxpayers Federation (CTF) today released its annual New Year Tax Change calculations which provide projected personal income and payroll tax changes taking effect January 1st, 2010.
CTF researchers calculated the changes for a variety of income levels and family scenarios while adjusting 2009 income levels for inflation.
NEW YEAR SAVINGS FOR DIFFERNT INCOME LEVELS AND INDIVIDUAL/FAMILY SENARIOS
DETAILS ON TAX CHANGES TAKING PLACE IN EACH PROVINCE
“The main tax changes for 2010 involve small payroll increases and the HST in Ontario and BC. Meanwhile, large deficits and rising debt are putting pressures on governments to raise taxes further,” said CTF Federal Director Kevin Gaudet.
Payroll Taxes on the Rise, Again
While the EI and CPP tax rates have not increased, their thresholds have. This means that anyone earning more than $47,200 will pay an additional $44 in payroll taxes in 2010.
“These payroll tax increases are likely just the tip of the iceberg as the federal government looks to run major EI surpluses through higher EI rates over the next few years,” continued Gaudet.
PAYROLL TAXES CHART AND GRAPH, 1994 TO 2010
General Business Income Taxes
The federal government continues to reduce business income taxes. They drop to 18% from 19%.
Provincial Winners and Losers
“Every New Year sees winners and losers, and this year the hands-down winners are the taxpayers of New Brunswick,” said Gaudet. “The CTF has been a champion of lower, simpler and flatter taxes in Canada, and New Brunswick is moving in the right direction.”
“British Columbians can also expect modest tax relief, but deficit spending and the new HST threaten to undue those gains, however modest,” Continued Gaudet.
Regarding Ontario, Gaudet noted a meagre move to lower the first bracket by a single point and meaningful reductions for business income taxes. However, Gaudet pointed out that those gains will be offset by substantial increases for individuals and families with the tax hike in the top two tax brackets and the new HST.
Turning to the rest of Canada, Gaudet stated, “They’re just coasting. There were few other major income or payroll tax changes.”
The provinces of Manitoba, Nova Scotia and Prince Edward Island continue to refuse to automatically index their tax brackets each year, causing a stealth tax hike via bracket creep.
New Brunswick Storms Ashore
The first tax bracket rises from 9.18% to 9.3%. The second bracket drops from 13.52% to 12.5%. The third drops from 15.2% to 13.3%. The fourth bracket drops from 16.05% to 14.4%. This means that New Brunswick taxpayers not only take home significantly more money, but that they also will have a greater incentive to work harder with punitive marginal tax rates somewhat flattened.
- A single individual making $60,000 will save $488, bringing this individual near the national average with an effective tax rate at 27.3%
- A family with a single earner and two children making $80,000 will save $922, bringing their effective rate near the national average at 25.6%
“Compared with other provinces, New Brunswick is only moving towards an average standing in income taxes come January 1st. However, this is meaningful progress. New Brunswick can and should go further. However, its first priority, as is that of all governments, must be to get spending under control and balance the books,” stated Gaudet.
HST on its Way
With the HST coming into force July 1st, 2010, the CTF is demanding that the Campbell government in BC offset any potential tax grab. “While raising the Basic Personal Amount from $9,373 to $11,000 should go part of the way in providing needed relief for low-income earners, middle-class families are still getting slammed by the HST. In BC and Ontario, the HST needs to be reduced by at least 2 percentage points,” continued Gaudet.
In trying to appease voter anger over the HST, the McGuinty government in Ontario is making a meagre adjustment to the first income bracket, moving it from 6.05% to 5.05% while completely offsetting most gains for Ontarians by increasing the thresholds for the two surtaxes in place. For example, a family with a single earner and two children making $100,000 will save a paltry $106 due only to indexation amounts increasing greater federally and provincially than the CTF adjustments used for inflation. In essence, Ontarians can expect a modest tax hike in terms of real income – not including the impact of the HST.
“The HST will eat up a sizable portion of Ontarian’s take-home pay. Rather than bribing taxpayers with a one-time cheque and raising surtaxes to wipe out the modest moves made in the first bracket, McGuinty needs to lower the HST to as low as 10% in a way that is fair to everyone,” concluded Gaudet.
Canada's Federal Debt
Your Share
The federal government is adding $58 million a day to our debt. By 2015-16, the debt is slated to hit $614 billion. Support our campaign for balanced federal budgets and help us STOP this clock.
Spokespeople & Blog
In five provinces and Ottawa a team of dedicated professionals is standing up to special interests, ensuring that taxpayers' voices are being heard.
In The News
-
How much do Canadians pay in taxes?
read more » -
BC gas taxes highest in Canada
read more » -
BC government's PR firms
read more » -
HST and Carbon tax reason for BC government's unpopularity
read more » -
TransLink executives receive big bonuses
read more » -
Reforming gold-plated MP Pensions
read more » -
Questions raised on flood relief funding to Peguis First Nations
read more » -
More taxes in 2012 Manitoba Budget
read more » -
Photo Radar Busted in Winnipeg!
read more » -
Big pay for transit police
read more » -
Free the Fishermen from Freshwater Fish Marketing Corporation
read more » -
TransLink executives receive big bonuses
read more » -
Two bills introduced in Ontario legislature to protect taxpayers
read more » -
Host of new tax increases for BC
read more » -
Questionable expenses at Freshwater Fish Marketing Corp
read more » -
TransLink has lost $230 million due to unpaid fares!
read more » -
TransLink's fare evasion problems
read more » -
TransLink can't collect its fines
read more » -
NS: NDP Promise of Tax Reductions, a “Welcome Relief” says CTF
read more » -
Sask Film Tax Credit Briefing
read more » -
Should there be cuts in the size of Canada’s federal public Service?
read more » -
CCPA calls for massive spending increases in federal budget
read more » -
Are attack ads on Bob Rae legit?
read more » -
Is TransLink Police force a waste of money?
read more »



























Comments
but hey
the city counsellors in almost each city earn pretty close to 500,000 dollars a year - most of the heads of government also earn above average wages - i don;t see any protests happening there - it seems to be okay to pay canadian politicians above average salaries but not okay for Native people - look how big Indian Affairs has grown in the past 10 to 15 years and take a look at how big the |Canadian government has grown as well - so there goes your tax dollars - there is huge amounts that go to the Chinese, Punjabi, and a host of other ethnic non-profits that the government funds ---
Buying Power
When is the government going to apply the kind of fiscal retraint they have placed on the taxpayers. Due to increasing taxes, incl HST, I no longer can buy the things I would like - hence affecting the ecomomy? In short, I tightened my belt. They (gov't MP's & the like) need to stop the spending bleed. Ooops I spent too much on First Nations 11 billion high (Big $$$ to chiefs, free medicare, boo hoo you promised give me more money so I can fill your jails and put a strain on your social system... take care of me)- "tansistion allowances" for MP's (huh? when I leave a job I don't keep getting paid)- Refugees (you can't come here through the proper channels your sent back.done)- new Minstry every minute (quit using our tax dollars to fatten unnessary pockets)- Bloated Unions like HEU & CUPE (enough already!! - NO job is safe. Why are my tax dollars paying for soemone else to be "safe". Pay should be earned not some god given right)- Trade Deficits in the billions (WHy are we trading to loose money??- war on drugs (we will never win / time to get logical) - and on & on and on. I am one fed up tax payer!!!
Ontario to get a one time cheque of up to 1000.00
Is that something that might happen in BC? I know we are already paying the carbon tax on gas and the cost of natural gas has increased and power and we pay quite a bit for gas for our car because of the carbon tax and various taxes on taxes.
IMPORTANT TO HAVE LOW INCOME TAX ON INDIVIDUALS
Dear Sir / madame
These are the advantages to have low income tax (including payroll taxes) to a maximum of 20% or less:
1. Increases the purchasing power of inidividuals whose take home pay increases due to low income tax
2. Increases the demand for goods & services which the corporation / companies / busiess produce & sells
3. The low income tax has more benefits to corporations / business compared to "all the corporations tax breaks" they get since for example a car company could have all the tax breaks they get and produces lots of cars BUT cannot sell it if the consumers (individuals) do not have enough take home pay to pay for those new cars.
4. The corporations should realize the "individual's purchasing power" creates the demand for their goods which increases their sales thus increases their "economic of scale" in production (and reduces the per unit cost of the production).
5. THE GOVERNMENT THINKS "GIVING A BREAK FOR CORPORATIONS ON TAXES" ALONE WOULD MAKES THE CORPORATIONS TO GROW ...THIS IS TOTALLY WROING... THE CORPORAITONS NEEDS CUSTOMERS WHO HAVE "PURCHASING POWER" (i.e. should have at least $80 take home pay for every $100 they earn).
6. If the customer is broke (after tax dollars not enough) which creates working poor who could only afford the "food & groceries on the table". NO MONEY FOR BUYING GOODS & SERVICES WHICH MAKES THE CORPORATIONS GO GO BANKRUPT DUE TO HIGH INVENTORY SITTING AT THE WAREHOUSES..
7. The low income tax on individuals creates more money in individuals / familes hands thus the families could have more children (could afford more than one kid per family) thus REDUCES THE NEED FOR IMMIGRATION WHICH REDUCES THE GOVERNMENT EXPENSES ON IMMIGRATION COST
8. More earned money in hands of individuals means less borrowing which means less debt which gives more stable economic growth.
the list goes on...
Post new comment