FED: CTF Asks Leaders to Appoint Anti-Long-Gun Registry MPs to Committee
OTTAWA: The Canadian Taxpayers Federation (CTF) has sent letters to Liberal Leader Michael Ignatieff and NDP Leader Jack Layton urging them to appoint to the Public Safety and National Security Committee MPs who will support Ms. Candice Hoeppner’s Bill C-391 to end the wasteful long-gun registry. The CTF also is encouraging its 60,000 supporters to contact Mr. Ignatieff and Mr. Layton with the same request.
CTF Federal Director, Kevin Gaudet, said “we congratulate the leaders for having allowed a free vote in the House on this issue. We urge them to continue this fair-minded approach at committee.”
Once the House resumes sitting, the bill will be returned to the Standing Committee for Public Safety and National Security for its review. With the prorogation of Parliament all committees were dissolved and must be reconstituted.
Prior to prorogation, the committee membership consisted of six MPs (Liberal, NDP and Bloc Quebecois) who voted against Bill C-391 and six who voted for Bill C-391 (all Conservatives). However, the chair only votes if there’s a tie. This essentially gave those who opposed Bill C-391 a majority on the committee.
The CTF has been opposed to the long-gun registry since the passing of Bill C-68 by then Justice Minister Rock. Since then the CTF has brought to Parliament tens of thousands of petitions signed by those wishing to see the long-gun registry abolished. Further, the CTF sought from the Auditor General an audit of the program that revealed, amongst other things, its tremendous waste.
Support for Ms. Hoeppner’s Bill to abolish the long-gun registry came regardless of party affiliation, including MPs from the Conservative Party, 12 from the NDP and eight from the Liberal Party.
Canada's Federal Debt
Your Share
The federal government is adding $58 million a day to our debt. By 2015-16, the debt is slated to hit $614 billion. Support our campaign for balanced federal budgets and help us STOP this clock.
Spokespeople & Blog
In five provinces and Ottawa a team of dedicated professionals is standing up to special interests, ensuring that taxpayers' voices are being heard.
In The News
-
How much do Canadians pay in taxes?
read more » -
BC gas taxes highest in Canada
read more » -
BC government's PR firms
read more » -
HST and Carbon tax reason for BC government's unpopularity
read more » -
TransLink executives receive big bonuses
read more » -
Reforming gold-plated MP Pensions
read more » -
Questions raised on flood relief funding to Peguis First Nations
read more » -
More taxes in 2012 Manitoba Budget
read more » -
Photo Radar Busted in Winnipeg!
read more » -
Big pay for transit police
read more » -
Free the Fishermen from Freshwater Fish Marketing Corporation
read more » -
TransLink executives receive big bonuses
read more » -
Two bills introduced in Ontario legislature to protect taxpayers
read more » -
Host of new tax increases for BC
read more » -
Questionable expenses at Freshwater Fish Marketing Corp
read more » -
TransLink has lost $230 million due to unpaid fares!
read more » -
TransLink's fare evasion problems
read more » -
TransLink can't collect its fines
read more » -
NS: NDP Promise of Tax Reductions, a “Welcome Relief” says CTF
read more » -
Sask Film Tax Credit Briefing
read more » -
Should there be cuts in the size of Canada’s federal public Service?
read more » -
CCPA calls for massive spending increases in federal budget
read more » -
Are attack ads on Bob Rae legit?
read more » -
Is TransLink Police force a waste of money?
read more »



























Comments
immigrants
Yep stop the immigrants completely we have enough now .
Only half true
The idea that an immigrant can receive more money than a Canadian senior is actually a myth that picked up legs because it got printed in a daily newspaper. No amount of correction can seem to counter this, although we have printed a counter article in our Taxpayer magazine at least twice. Scroll down to the Canadian section at this link to find the full story: http://www.snopes.com/politics/immigration/refugees.asp.
It is entirely possible that someone could acquire dual citizenship, move to their original country, and take advantage of their Canadian citizenship in whatever ways possible. Solving this problem is not straightforward unless we required people to revoke their initial citizenship in order to become Canadian citizens. However, this has drawbacks of its own.
Pensioners
Someone who has lived and worked their entire life in Canada should not be subject to this embarrassment.
I also heard that there are a lot of people who immigrates into Canada, return to where they are from and only use us as a tool for health and protection.
Is there something that we, as Canadians, can do to stop this stupidity?
Post new comment