BC: Eliminate the Property Transfer Tax
Taxpayers in British Columbia are outraged about the harmonized sales tax (HST), and rightly so. It will add a new tax to many items previously exempt from the provincial sales tax (PST), such as restaurant meals and new homes. The HST does, however, have some theoretical benefits. It simplifies the tax system and makes the province a more competitive place for business investment.
Nevertheless, the surprise HST announcement was met by a business lobbying effort demanding relief from the tax. One group that got a break was the new home building industry. While this may help a few new home buyers, it undermines the tax simplification benefits of the HST and does little to improve B.C.'s competitiveness. In fact, the government could have bolstered the competitiveness of the province and helped all families struggling to purchase homes by eliminating the property transfer tax instead.
The property transfer tax (PTT) hits all property sales. It has no economic benefit, taxes mobility and is a job killer that discourages companies from locating in B.C. The PTT adds 2 per cent to the property price, less $2,000. So, a family struggling to buy a $525,000 home would have to pay an additional $8,500 in PTT.
The PTT was brought in by the Vander Zalm government in 1988 and became such a fantastic cash cow that no government since has eliminated it. Yet, the B.C. government knows the PTT is a bad tax. A motion at the BC Liberal Convention in 2006 moved that the government abolish the PTT. The resolution was passed with overwhelming support and is part of BC Liberal party policy.
But this is where party policy and government policy diverge.
This tax generated almost $1 billion in revenue each year over the past five years on the backs of families struggling to buy homes, searching for a better life in new locations, and on businesses trying to expand. It makes B.C. a less competitive place for business investment.
Not only that, the revenue brought in by the PTT makes the break on the HST for new home buyers look like chump change.
Since it announced the HST, the government said it wants to be sure some new home buyers pay 'no more' in tax on new homes than they would have paid before the HST. Then, to show it had been listening to complaints about the HST, the government raised the threshold for the HST rebate on new homes from $400,000 to $525,000, and the maximum rebate from $20,000 to $26,250. This move will only put about $80 million per year back into the pockets of homebuyers, far less than what eliminating the PTT would have.
So the question becomes, why would the government complicate the HST and pander to the building industry by giving them a break instead of just getting rid of the PTT? The government might say it was because it listens to its key support groups. However, the real reason is more likely because government is addicted to the revenue stream the PTT provides.
If the government were truly interested in making B.C. a competitive place for business investment and helping families buy homes, it would eliminate the PTT.
Canada's Federal Debt
Your Share
The federal government is adding $135 million a day to our debt. At this rate, the $105-billion in debt repayment between 1997 – 2008 will be wiped out next year. Support our campaign for a federal balanced budget law and help us STOP this clock.
Spokespeople & Blog
In five provinces and Ottawa a team of dedicated professionals is standing up to special interests, ensuring that taxpayers' voices are being heard.
In The News
-
BC: Taxpayers should have say on Port Coquitlam city council pay increase
read more » -
AB: Edmonton Arena controversy
read more » -
BC: Backlash against massive pay hikes at Port Coquitlam city council
read more » -
Ontario government pummels taxpayers with Eco Tax
read more » -
Growing opposition to Ontario Enviro taxes introduced July 1, 2010
read more » -
Winter Olympic Costs Continue to Snowball
read more » -
Carbon Tax Slams BC Taxpayers July 1, 2010
read more » -
CTV interview with Kevin Gaudet on Ontario’s HST
read more » -
HST coming to Ontario July 1, 2010
read more » -
Setting priorities for Foreign Aid subsidies
read more » -
CTF Launches Pig Brigade on Parliament Hill to Expose Excessive MP Pensions
read more » -
CTF Bombards Parliament Hill with Pigs
read more » -
Stick to the bear necessities in Manitoba
read more » -
Cost breakdown of G20 Media Centre
read more » -
MP's family has him flying high
read more » -
Calgary contract corruption?
read more » -
Media from Gas Tax Honesty Day 2010
read more » -
Why MPs should reveal their expenses
read more » -
Indian Affairs Minister Speaks on Chief Salaries
read more » -
HST Ambush
read more » -
CTF delivers 46,000 names on Olson petition
read more » -
P3s Debated on Alberta Primetime
read more » -
Olympic bills trickle in: $550 million so far
read more » -
Alberta chief earns more than premier
read more »



























Comments
HST on new building lots
There never was PST on new building lots, and I am having trouble getting information on just a new lot that a developer is selling for the first time. There was GST but NO PST and then the PPT. I am told that now it will have a 12% HST tax instead of the 5% GST that people were paying before, and I thought I read that rebates only on building? not land? Previously you could get a GST rebate on your land if you chose to?
I am just having trouble with this, as it's supposed to be a blended tax, but instead just a huge increase in cases? Even if they blended the GST and PPT this would be conciderably less.
The real tax debate.....
Similar to eliminating the PTT, the real HST debate is being missed altogether. Instead of arguing over the merits of HST vs PST, the gov't should be looking at ways to eliminate the PST. Alberta has no PST, and remains the most competitive province in Canada. BC is addicted to tax revenue - PTT, PST and others. No matter which party is in power, they are forced to pander to the culture of entitlement that exists in the BC electorate. Driven by unions and other special interests, BC will never sober up, and will always be looking for new ways to draw yet more tax revenue from residents.
Transfer tax
We had been seriously considering purchasing property in BC as a retirement property. The HST and Transfer taxes have cancelled that idea. There are a lot better places to retire and invest than BC, particularly since BC is commonly seen as an overtaxed, union run province where 105% of the province is under Indian "traditional" land claims.
BC is a bad place to be.
HST/PPT
A consumption tax (HST) is as fair as a tax can be...the more you spend the more you pay. The PPT also closes a major loophole on taxation. I owned a hardware store for 23 years in the town I live in..Crofton. Over 1/2 of the people I dealt with that changed homes in less than 5 years did so to avoid capital gains tax. Buy or build a home, live in it. fix it up and resell at a profit. The PPT redirects some of the profit to the province. I owned my previous home for 32 years, the $4000 PPT I paid when I moved annoyed me but it is likely the last time I will pay it. The tax that many of my friends worry about most is property tax. In North Cowichan my taxes have doubled in 8 years, now over $4000/yr (not $4000 PPT once). My entire CPP is consumed by property tax and the new BC Hydro rates. We do not have enough money to spend to worry about the HST or the PPT. The PPT should be diverted to a fund to give homeowners tax relief, such as school taxes that have no relation to a homeowners ability to pay. Jim Copley
Post new comment