Pat Laforge succumbs to temptation
Oilers President/Katz Arena salesman Patrick Laforge crossed a very important line recently, and one that I recall Dr. Brad Humpreys warning me would occur.
In David Staple’s story in the Edmonton Journal, Laforge opted to make the unsubstantiated claim that a new arena development would create economic benefits.
In his own words:
“This would be the catalyst for some serious new money to come to the city. ... And whatever comes to downtown Edmonton as a result, related to this investment, would be absolutely found money for Edmonton.”
“It's not just moving money from the left pocket to the right pocket. It creates new business.” (emphasis mine)
Prior to this point the Oilers/Katz group/Mayor had opted not to make this incorrect claim. In fact, they were heeding the advice they received from Dr. Dan Mason and Dr. Rosentraub.
In his final report to the Mayor’s committee (which included Laforge), Dr. Rosentraub expressly wrote:
“[C]ommunity leaders thought (or hoped) that the mere presence of a sports facility would change a city’s image and induce economic development. Independent assessments of the benefits from these facilities, predictably found no economic development enhancements, and no real shifts in a city image.”
He continues:
“If used as an anchor for an overall strategy these facilities could change the location of economic activity”
Or to put it in Laforge-speak: move money from the left pocket to the right pocket.
But now, Mr. Laforge has opted to go against all the expert advice taxpayers and the Oilers paid for, and against virtually all the peer-reviewed academic research on this topic, and start making stuff up.
Funny enough, well over a year ago I recall having a discussion about the Rosentraub paper with Dr. Brad Humphreys (the foremost expert in North America on the economic benefits of new arenas/stadiums, called before Congress to testify about the economic benefits -- or lack thereof -- of the new Yankee stadium) and saying to him something along the lines of: “Hey isn’t it great that the Rosentraub paper points out that there are no economic benefits? I guess that means they won’t be able to make an argument that they know is a blatant lie.”
To which he responded to me something like: “Just wait, they will. They always do.”
Looks like he was right.
Canada's Federal Debt
Your Share
The federal government is adding $58 million a day to our debt. By 2015-16, the debt is slated to hit $614 billion. Support our campaign for balanced federal budgets and help us STOP this clock.
Spokespeople & Blog
In five provinces and Ottawa a team of dedicated professionals is standing up to special interests, ensuring that taxpayers' voices are being heard.
In The News
-
How much do Canadians pay in taxes?
read more » -
BC gas taxes highest in Canada
read more » -
BC government's PR firms
read more » -
HST and Carbon tax reason for BC government's unpopularity
read more » -
TransLink executives receive big bonuses
read more » -
Reforming gold-plated MP Pensions
read more » -
Questions raised on flood relief funding to Peguis First Nations
read more » -
More taxes in 2012 Manitoba Budget
read more » -
Photo Radar Busted in Winnipeg!
read more » -
Big pay for transit police
read more » -
Free the Fishermen from Freshwater Fish Marketing Corporation
read more » -
TransLink executives receive big bonuses
read more » -
Two bills introduced in Ontario legislature to protect taxpayers
read more » -
Host of new tax increases for BC
read more » -
Questionable expenses at Freshwater Fish Marketing Corp
read more » -
TransLink has lost $230 million due to unpaid fares!
read more » -
TransLink's fare evasion problems
read more » -
TransLink can't collect its fines
read more » -
Sask Film Tax Credit Briefing
read more » -
Should there be cuts in the size of Canada’s federal public Service?
read more » -
CCPA calls for massive spending increases in federal budget
read more » -
Are attack ads on Bob Rae legit?
read more » -
Is TransLink Police force a waste of money?
read more » -
Chalk Talk: Growing Government Pay and Pension Gap
read more »



























Comments
Post new comment