City Employees "Driving" Urban Sprawl?

Whenever I hear politicians at City Hall and other activists speak about the need to prevent urban sprawl, I have often wondered how many City of Winnipeg employees actually live outside the city's boundaries?

Well, today I got the answer.

You see, I filed an information request with the City of Winnipeg back on January 31, 2012 for the number of employees with residences listed outside the city. According to the city's response, 1,649 employees don't live in Winnipeg. As the 2010 annual report notes that city had an average of 9,942 employees,  that means about 16.5% of the city's workforce doesn't live in Winnipeg.

I don't know if the number is high or low as I don't have any benchmarks to compare it to, but I do know the crowd worried about urban sprawl at the city won't have far to look if it wants to research why people choose to live outside Winnipeg. And when councillors and other organizations come up with new ideas on how to tax those outside the city...well there are plenty of plenty of city employees they can ask for feedback.

For the record, I totally understand why many city employees choose to live outside of Winnipeg - Oakbank, East St. Paul and many of the other bedroom communities around the perimeter are great places to live. Not to mention the fact that many of them have lower taxes. ;)

By: Colin Craig
Posted: February 13, 2012
Topic: Manitoba

Bookmark and Share Join Us   |   Donate

Comments

If property taxes were based

If property taxes were based primarily on the value of the land rather than the building, all properties would be upzoned to five storeys, minimum setback restrictions eliminated, decrease development charges to zero for medium- and high-density housing, increasing development charges for low-density housing, shifting roads spending toward public transit, it would be a lot cheaper to build upward than outward.

I hear you Anonymous - living

I hear you Anonymous - living outside the city has many advantages - lower crime, often lower taxes, not having to pay for as many pet projects of others, a quieter environment etc.

However, I can see the benefits of living inside the city as well - the most important for me being convenience for work and social purposes (parks, shopping, getting together with friends/family, etc.)

What gets me is that some city politicians seem to spend more time thinking of how they can tax those that choose to live outside the city rather than doing something about the problems that are pushing people away from Winnipeg in the first place - crime, our roads, etc.

I will always live outside of

I will always live outside of a city, but nearby enough that I can do business in a large population or have access to things harder to get in rural areas.

I would never wantt to live in a city and contend with traffic, parking, crowds, etc..

Can't take it.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Canada's Federal Debt

Your Share

The federal government is adding $58 million a day to our debt. By 2015-16, the debt is slated to hit $614 billion. Support our campaign for balanced federal budgets and help us STOP this clock.

View Debt »

Spokespeople & Blog

In five provinces and Ottawa a team of dedicated professionals is standing up to special interests, ensuring that taxpayers' voices are being heard.

View all spokespeople »
Go to Blog »

In The News

 

 

Sign-Up

Join with over 70,000 Canadian taxpayers. Get instant action updates and make a difference.

64,232

Donate
Take Action

Vimeo video Facebook Twitter RSS Feed YouTube Channel