Why Canadian NHL teams/rinks went bankrupt (Part 1)

There has been considerable spin by the Katz group and some of their friends (HERE, HERE and HERE) to convince Edmontonians that the real reason why they can't fund their own arena is that Canadian owners have tried that in the past and have all gone bankrupt because of the arena.

This simply isn't true.  Or at least the arena was not the only or even major factor in any of the cases.

In this three part series we will look at the true story behind the bankruptcies.

Part 1: The Ottawa Senators and the Corel Centre (now Scotiabank Place)

Ottawa Senators owner Rod Bryden built the Corel Centre in 1996 at a cost of $217m ($294m in 2011$).  In addition to paying for the land and the building, Bryden was forced by the Ontario government to put up the cost of the highway overpass.  At an approximate cost of $27m the province was generous enough to provide Mr. Bryden a loan so that he could build the highway infrastructure required of him. This loan was restructured in 2003 for the remaining $21m.

Bryden declared bankruptcy in 2003 and sold the team and the Corel Centre to Eugene Melnyk for $130m - a considerable loss.

So, what precipitated this loss and the bankruptcy?

Well, why don't we ask Mr. Bryden:

"players' salaries and the Canadian dollar just blew that all away. It turned out to be just a dreadful period for a Canadian company that relied on Canadian revenues and had to pay export (U.S.) dollars."

Further from the same article:

"Bryden figured that he would still own the Senators had Enron Corp. not collapsed and dragged Covanta Energy Corp., a primary lender for the Corel Centre, down with it.

Covanta had to seek bankruptcy protection and that, Bryden figured, eventually forced the Senators into insolvency too."

 

To recap why Bryden went bankrupt and had to sell the team and the arena:

  • High players salaries during a non-salary cap era of the NHL
  • Low Canadian dollar
  • Financing from Covanta Energy Corp who had to seek bankruptcy protection due to Enron collapse
  • Government requirement for private land developer to pay for $27m overpass

 

 

 

 

 

By: Scott Hennig
Posted: October 12, 2011
Topic: Alberta

Bookmark and Share Join Us   |   Donate

Comments

Anon,Very good question. Even

Anon,

Very good question. Even if we accept that construction costs grow faster than simple inflation, why was the one built in Pittsburg last year for $320m and this one is $450m?

John,Thanks for the extra

John,

Thanks for the extra details on the Ottawa deal. And I think it strengthens the point that there are many factors that bankrupt many professional sports teams, and it's not as simple as saying that because Bryden (or Firestone) had to build their own arena he went bankrupt.

I'm not sure how to answer your costing question of a "brutal" downtown, but I know what it cost taxpayers to revitalize Columbus' downtown.  Next to nothing.

Which is exactly what the City of Edmonton should spend on it.  Allow master developer status to the Katz Group and let them develop all of that land on their dime and for their own profit.

 

Rod Bryden was not the

Rod Bryden was not the original owner of the Senators, Bruce Firestone was.
Firestone's vision was that a 600-acre town, called West Terrace, built from scratch in what was then called Kanata, would provide the cash flow to pay the $50 million fee for an NHL expansion franchise and a state-of-the-art arena. It was a real-estate play with an NHL franchise and arena as its centrepiece.
I know, I covered that franchise during those years.
Because the land was zoned farm land, the project had to be approved by the Ontario Municipal Board.
They approved the development of an arena and adjacent parking lot on the 98-acre footprint where Scotiabank Place now sits. But the OMB nixed the town.
Bryden was the financial muscle, such as it was, behind the franchise. He first bought 50 per cent of Terrace Investments, Firestone's real estate company, then bought out Firestone altogether.
The truth was, the franchise was under-capitalized from the beginning, but land rich. For the first few years, the Senators had a tiny payroll, anyway, so Bryden is being a bit revisionist to say huge salaries did them in.
They were strapped even when they were paying tiny salaries to the discards they had in their lineup.
Anyway, in the end, being land rich wasn't worth much. To make matters worse, the real estate market went south.
Ogden Entertainment (which eventually went bankrupt)underwrote the heavily mortgaged Senators to help them cover both the franchise fee and the arena construction.
Essentially, the Senators pledged future revenue streams as collateral for loans that Ogden guaranteed.
At any rate, they were cash-poor, to say the least, from the beginning, and eventually went bankrupt, along with Ogden.
Melnyk purchased the team and arena out of bankruptcy.
Ottawa was a model for how not to run an NHL franchise on just about every level.
The fact remains, using the Senators history as an example of a deep-pocketed owner footing the bill himself was never operative at all. It was a financial fiasco from the word go.
I continue to find it curious that in black-and-white Alberta, there seem to be only two ways to make a project work:
entirely with public money (Commonwealth Stadium, Rexall Place, etc.), but with no individual profiting unduly (whatever that means, because both Pocklington and the EIG had sweetheart rent arrangements); or for a rich individual/corporation to cover it all.
It seems a simple prism through which to see the world.
For the entrepreneur, it's not merely about the cost of a building, it's about the business case in the long haul. Two different things.
The quid pro quo for the city is largely in the quality of life boost a downtown arena can provide, in concert with a rich variety of other urban elements (LRT, existing office towers, RAM, shopping, restaurants, bars, night clubs, AGA, city hall, libraries, cinemaas).
For many in Edmonton, the focus is unswervingly on cost, though, never on benefit. This continues to baffle me. Are people here so ascetic they think a sterile, unstimulating downtown is the best they can hope for?
Perhaps a city whose downtown has been moribund for so many decades has no faith that anything could help improve it, whether it's an arena, an arena and a large museum, or an arena, a large museum, an art gallery, and a whole cluster of other projects housed in the city's downtown improvement plan.
It does take time and it does take many, many elements, including lots of residents downtown.
Edmonton has a long way to go, owing to decades of neglect. The arena is not the alpha and omega. But, along with other venues already mentioned, it's a good start.
Since cost is your fixation, how would you calculate the cost to Edmonton for having such a brutal downtown for so many years?
What is a reasonable cost to fix it?
And how should that cost be borne?

Any idea Scott why Ottawa's

Any idea Scott why Ottawa's rink, in 2011 adjusted dollars, is 65% the cost of the rink Katz wants Edmonton to build him here?

Good point. I look forward to

Good point. I look forward to parts two and three.
I am an Edmontonian and though I support the downtown arena, I don't support the lack of solid facts or metrics from either side.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Canada's Federal Debt

Your Share

The federal government is adding $58 million a day to our debt. By 2015-16, the debt is slated to hit $614 billion. Support our campaign for balanced federal budgets and help us STOP this clock.

View Debt »

Spokespeople & Blog

In five provinces and Ottawa a team of dedicated professionals is standing up to special interests, ensuring that taxpayers' voices are being heard.

View all spokespeople »
Go to Blog »

In The News

 

 

Sign-Up

Join with over 70,000 Canadian taxpayers. Get instant action updates and make a difference.

64,232

Donate
Take Action

Vimeo video Facebook Twitter RSS Feed YouTube Channel