Will the Real Rough Riders Please Stand Up?
The most divisive debates in Canadian society normally revolve around two things: language and region. East versus west, French versus English, Toronto versus the Rest of Canada. We are united in our disunity. At the centre of both language and regional tensions is a 100 year dispute between Ottawa and Saskatchewan, or more eloquently, between the Rough Riders and the Roughriders.
Fans of the Saskatchewan Roughriders are some of the most passionate fans in Canada, comparable with Leaf fans except in that while Roughrider fans believe that they can win the cup and sometimes do, Leaf fans believe that they will win their league's respective cup and, well, don't. Despite this, the passion of Rider Nation often leads to irrational claims that they are the "real" Roughriders, normally explained away by serial conspiracy theories.
Using the most factual source that this author could muster in 10 seconds, Wikipedia settles the debate once and for all, stating clearly that, "The Ottawa Rough Riders were a Canadian Football League (CFL) team based in Ottawa, Ontario, founded in 1876." In a separate article, Wikipedia states that, "The Saskatchewan Roughriders are a CFL team based in Regina, Saskatchewan, founded in 1910." For Saskatchewan fans and CTF Webmaster Dean Smith, let it be known that that is 34 years later.
There is some justification however for Saskatchewan's copying Ottawa's team name. Canadian football and rugby teams existed in a number of smaller league's and sporting unions for most of the sport's early history and so when Saskatchewan founded her team, they were in separate leagues. Only as the two teams later came into competition with one another did the absurdity of two teams sharing a name in a small league become obvious.
But even the claim (as I made above) that they share the same name is not without challenge. Ottawa's team is the "Rough Riders", while Saskatchewan's is the "Roughriders."
With Ottawa closing in on re-founding it's team in the not-to-distant future, it should not be made to squabble below the banner of the "Renegades" or any other new name, but rather, declare that now is the time for a historic truce. The Roughriders in green should - as good sportsmen - allow Ottawa to reclaim it's rightful name, and the Rough Riders in black should in return cease taunting Saskatchewan for "stealing" or "copying" it's name.
Lets let the CFL, like Canada itself, return to its normal, quirky and at times bizarre self. Lets bring football back to Ottawa and let the first game kickoff with a showdown between the black and green Rough-Riders.
Canada's Federal Debt
Your Share
The federal government is adding $58 million a day to our debt. By 2015-16, the debt is slated to hit $614 billion. Support our campaign for balanced federal budgets and help us STOP this clock.
Spokespeople & Blog
In five provinces and Ottawa a team of dedicated professionals is standing up to special interests, ensuring that taxpayers' voices are being heard.
In The News
-
How much do Canadians pay in taxes?
read more » -
BC gas taxes highest in Canada
read more » -
BC government's PR firms
read more » -
HST and Carbon tax reason for BC government's unpopularity
read more » -
TransLink executives receive big bonuses
read more » -
Reforming gold-plated MP Pensions
read more » -
Questions raised on flood relief funding to Peguis First Nations
read more » -
More taxes in 2012 Manitoba Budget
read more » -
Photo Radar Busted in Winnipeg!
read more » -
Big pay for transit police
read more » -
Free the Fishermen from Freshwater Fish Marketing Corporation
read more » -
TransLink executives receive big bonuses
read more » -
Two bills introduced in Ontario legislature to protect taxpayers
read more » -
Host of new tax increases for BC
read more » -
Questionable expenses at Freshwater Fish Marketing Corp
read more » -
TransLink has lost $230 million due to unpaid fares!
read more » -
TransLink's fare evasion problems
read more » -
TransLink can't collect its fines
read more » -
Sask Film Tax Credit Briefing
read more » -
Should there be cuts in the size of Canada’s federal public Service?
read more » -
CCPA calls for massive spending increases in federal budget
read more » -
Are attack ads on Bob Rae legit?
read more » -
Is TransLink Police force a waste of money?
read more » -
Chalk Talk: Growing Government Pay and Pension Gap
read more »



























Comments
Just a couple of points
While it is true that the Ottawa Roughriders were the first, there are a couple of points to make:
1) only one franchise currently exists using the Roughrider name (in either form).
2) the Saskatchewan franchise has used the name continuously longer (having taken the name in 1924). Ottawa changed back to the Rough Rider name in 1932.
3) The Saskatchewan franchise has used the name for 86 consecutive years. The Ottawa franchise used the name for 64 years consecutively before the franchise folded.
In short, I (and many other) Rider fans don't blame you for wanting to create a link to the past, but the reality is that the franchise you knew as the Rough Riders died because of lack of support 15 seasons ago. I look forward to a retro game pitting the Rough Riders vs the Roughriders, but I would not support your supposition that the franchise should be nicknamed the Rough Riders again. Given the way the league ended up with 2 Rider teams in the first place, I would submit that it would rightfully invite ridicule if the now combined league allowed a new franchise to use the name of another franchise in the league.
Rough Riders Name Discussion
Of a football league consisting at this date in time of only 8 teams (9 next year, 2011, with Ottawa included) why do two teams need to have the same name? This is ridiculous. Saskatchewan should retain the name as they have been using the name for a longer consecutive period of time. Period. I hope this will now end any more silly discussion of this topic. Case closed.
Post new comment